Tuesday, February 12, 2019

WHY WE TRANSSEXUALS ARE LEAVING THE STONEWALL UMBRELLA


STATEMENT: -

 

We are a group of transsexual men and women - different human beings sharing one thing. Each of us knew early in life that something was wrong.

Physically we were defined as one sex but had internal dissonance that we were the other. It manifests to us as an overwhelming body/mind miss match, but its cause is not assumed or yet known.

Faced with this we did what most people would do confronting gender dysphoria - seek help from doctors, be examined, look for causes, try solutions and only after lengthy physical and psychological assessment consider surgical and hormonal transition to adapt our sexual characteristics.

Some of us are passing through this process. Others completed these stages decades ago. We accept our transition is an accommodation but it is the recommended medical pathway.

With safeguards this process works. We are able to live happy, productive lives and contribute to society in many ways.

Our legal rights were once few but we lived peacefully and respectfully with others and got on with our lives.

Things changed around the turn of the century when the GRA (Gender Recognition Act) was created in the UK. Parliament in 2004 was told by doctors that about 5000 transsexuals would apply. 15 years later 4910 have. So this was not reflecting a sudden fad. It was well predicted by medicine after decades of study.

Things have altered dramatically and we are very concerned. The GRA was a mutual bond of trust between us and society. For the right to be legally defined as the sex we transition into, we accept a need for lengthy assessment and gatekeeping. We also accept exemptions where in things such as refuges, shortlists and sports one on one assessment is made and we can be excluded.
Then Stonewall, a charity advising the government, promoted a 'transgender umbrella'. We 5000 transsexuals were made one tiny part of 500,000 now defined as trans or transgender.

There is a bewildering array of others, from those who are genuinely gender confused or identify as both genders, live as cross dressers, or appear to have psychological problems. We are as puzzled by such concepts as many others.

The reason is simple - these are trans gender variations. They come from discomfort with ability to express gender roles.

Trans sexuals are not driven by gender expression - but have dysphoria caused by rejection of their bodily sex. Its cause is not known but it produces severe distress. The important need of transsexuals to physically transition results from this cause and there is a consequent lack of necessity for physical transition for those who are trans gender.

We respect the rights of transgender people to express their lifestyle without repression.

However, gender and sex are not the same and some of those seeking to remove all gatekeeping were in the past medically excluded from the NHS transition process because they did not have this dysphoria. Different treatment protocols and protections for society may be appropriate in both cases and could be compromised if treated as being equivalent.

As such we fear safety is at risk for those transitioning unwisely without considering all options or being assessed for appropriate causes. Cases of de-transition are being reported more often when, with gatekeeping, these were rare.

We also worry about children who may be put on irreversible medication too young for them to be sure whether they are trans gender or transsexual or something else that may not require it.

Much more research is necessary but is often blocked by activism claiming it is transphobic. We regard it as nothing of the sort, but rather essential to offer better options for an insidious medical condition we wish upon nobody.

Consequently we believe that as transsexuals we cannot continue as part of this Stonewall umbrella, which, we feel, conflates a sex based medical condition with lifestyle choices and gender expression. And makes statements and decisions we disagree with profoundly.

Without claiming to know causes for either condition nor arguing that sex can be literally changed we see real dangers in equivocating things that require very different treatment and have consequences that will also impact themselves on society differently.

We feel that, in listening to this advice, government planning for self-ID into safe spaces that are currently well gatekept by psychiatrists is doing a disservice to many people - notably women and girls, the 5000 transsexuals for whom the GRA was written specifically and the many thousands of others it may inadvisably encourage to transition by making it too easy to do so.

Potentially this will have serious long term irretrievable consequences on those for whom gatekeeping may before have given time for careful thought or deterred such actions.

Therefore, the undersigned, as transsexual men and women, formally advise that we no longer wish to be considered part of the Stonewall umbrella.

At present we are 14 who have taken this stand but we believe that there are more of you ready to offer support. If you feel able please make that known.

       If you are transsexual and agree with our concerns, add your name, or a user name, initials, or just an occupation to this statement.  

Thank you.

 

Signed:- Amanda Dee, Emma Haywood,  Jennifer Kenyon, Leanne Mills, Jenny Randles, Melissa Symes, Gillian (electronic engineer), Sarah (broadcast engineer), Sarah (university lecturer), Zia, FP (business owner), JY (support worker) & usernames - babywantsbluevelvet & seven hex.

19 comments:

  1. as a M2F TS I wholeheartedly support this statement TM

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Whole heartedly support you. Thank you for being a voice of reason.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is being shared worldwide,wholehearted support for what you're all doing

    ReplyDelete
  5. There is a trans umbrella that groups together all varieties of trans but this existed long before Stonewall even started to think about trans people. To assign the umbrella to them is ridiculous. Trans people wanted to be inclusive of all trans people but that appears to be changing to a period of gatekeeping now...

    ReplyDelete
  6. You don't speak for all trans people and trust me, the damage you 14 are doing is horrific.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But he those trans activists want pedophillia added to the lgbt.Load of horrible bullies like Kate montgomery and bella witch who is a sex worker and makes her own dresses

      Delete
    2. Suuuuure. Sheesh, do you terfs believe your own lies or don't you care?

      Delete
  7. Thank you, support your well argued point.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you. I admire your integrity and hope that whatever vitriol comes your way will be drowned by the expressions of solidarity and gratitude for your brave stance. I am sure it will be of enormous benefit to public discusion on GRA going forward.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Can we make this an official statement on like moveon.org? I want to back this up so hard!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I fully support the GRS and gatekeeping which seperates the frauds and if its changed then it will be a big slap in the face to every real transgender women doing for the right reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  11. finally someone is speaking the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  12. thank you for speaking out, trans has become a complete mockery and danger

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have several reservations about this, perhaps of most concern is the very large number of trans people who for personal or beurocratic reason have either not applied fir, or been denied a GIC even having fully medically transitioned.

    My second concern is that by laying the whole thing at the door of Stonewall you seem to be ignoring all of the work done by many laudable organisations while Stonewall still excluded us from all of their campaigning.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Please, everyone, look up Lovaas and Operation Paperclip. Then you will see.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Very good analysis of the current situation.
    TS'S need to respond to the Scottish Gov's consultation and stop self ID being written into the law.

    ReplyDelete