STATEMENT: -
We are a group
of transsexual men and women - different human beings sharing one thing. Each
of us knew early in life that something was wrong.
Physically we
were defined as one sex but had internal dissonance that we were the other. It
manifests to us as an overwhelming body/mind miss match, but its cause is not
assumed or yet known.
Faced with this
we did what most people would do confronting gender dysphoria - seek help from
doctors, be examined, look for causes, try solutions and only after lengthy
physical and psychological assessment consider surgical and hormonal transition
to adapt our sexual characteristics.
Some of us are
passing through this process. Others completed these stages decades ago. We
accept our transition is an accommodation but it is the recommended medical
pathway.
With safeguards
this process works. We are able to live happy, productive lives and contribute
to society in many ways.
Our legal rights
were once few but we lived peacefully and respectfully with others and got on
with our lives.
Things changed
around the turn of the century when the GRA (Gender Recognition Act) was
created in the UK. Parliament in 2004 was told by doctors that about 5000
transsexuals would apply. 15 years later 4910 have. So this was not reflecting
a sudden fad. It was well predicted by medicine after decades of study.
Things have
altered dramatically and we are very concerned. The GRA was a mutual bond of
trust between us and society. For the right to be legally defined as the sex we
transition into, we accept a need for lengthy assessment and gatekeeping. We also
accept exemptions where in things such as refuges, shortlists and sports one on
one assessment is made and we can be excluded.
Then Stonewall,
a charity advising the government, promoted a 'transgender umbrella'. We 5000
transsexuals were made one tiny part of 500,000 now defined as trans or
transgender.
There is a
bewildering array of others, from those who are genuinely gender confused or
identify as both genders, live as cross dressers, or appear to have
psychological problems. We are as puzzled by such concepts as many others.
The reason is
simple - these are trans gender variations.
They come from discomfort with ability to express gender roles.
Trans sexuals are not driven by gender
expression - but have dysphoria caused by rejection of their bodily sex. Its
cause is not known but it produces severe distress. The important need of
transsexuals to physically transition results from this cause and there is a
consequent lack of necessity for physical transition for those who are trans
gender.
We respect the
rights of transgender people to express their lifestyle without repression.
However, gender
and sex are not the same and some of those seeking to remove all gatekeeping
were in the past medically excluded from the NHS transition process because
they did not have this dysphoria. Different treatment protocols and protections
for society may be appropriate in both cases and could be compromised if
treated as being equivalent.
As such we fear
safety is at risk for those transitioning unwisely without considering all
options or being assessed for appropriate causes. Cases of de-transition are
being reported more often when, with gatekeeping, these were rare.
We also worry
about children who may be put on irreversible medication too young for them to
be sure whether they are trans gender or transsexual or something else that may
not require it.
Much more
research is necessary but is often blocked by activism claiming it is
transphobic. We regard it as nothing of the sort, but rather essential to offer
better options for an insidious medical condition we wish upon nobody.
Consequently we
believe that as transsexuals we cannot continue as part of this Stonewall
umbrella, which, we feel, conflates a sex based medical condition with
lifestyle choices and gender expression. And makes statements and decisions we
disagree with profoundly.
Without claiming
to know causes for either condition nor arguing that sex can be literally
changed we see real dangers in equivocating things that require very different
treatment and have consequences that will also impact themselves on society
differently.
We feel that, in
listening to this advice, government planning for self-ID into safe spaces that
are currently well gatekept by psychiatrists is doing a disservice to many
people - notably women and girls, the 5000 transsexuals for whom the GRA was
written specifically and the many thousands of others it may inadvisably
encourage to transition by making it too easy to do so.
Potentially this
will have serious long term irretrievable consequences on those for whom
gatekeeping may before have given time for careful thought or deterred such
actions.
Therefore, the
undersigned, as transsexual men and women, formally advise that we no longer
wish to be considered part of the Stonewall umbrella.
At present we
are 14 who have taken this stand but we believe that there are more of you
ready to offer support. If you feel able please make that known.
If you are transsexual and agree with our concerns, add your name, or a user name, initials, or just an occupation to this statement.
If you are transsexual and agree with our concerns, add your name, or a user name, initials, or just an occupation to this statement.
Thank you.
Signed:- Amanda
Dee, Emma Haywood, Jennifer Kenyon, Leanne Mills, Jenny Randles, Melissa Symes, Gillian (electronic engineer), Sarah (broadcast engineer), Sarah
(university lecturer), Zia, FP (business owner), JY (support worker) & usernames -
babywantsbluevelvet & seven hex.
as a M2F TS I wholeheartedly support this statement TM
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhole heartedly support you. Thank you for being a voice of reason.
ReplyDeleteThis is being shared worldwide,wholehearted support for what you're all doing
ReplyDeleteThere is a trans umbrella that groups together all varieties of trans but this existed long before Stonewall even started to think about trans people. To assign the umbrella to them is ridiculous. Trans people wanted to be inclusive of all trans people but that appears to be changing to a period of gatekeeping now...
ReplyDelete-Tranime Girl
ReplyDeleteTranimeGirl.com
You don't speak for all trans people and trust me, the damage you 14 are doing is horrific.
ReplyDeleteBut he those trans activists want pedophillia added to the lgbt.Load of horrible bullies like Kate montgomery and bella witch who is a sex worker and makes her own dresses
DeleteSuuuuure. Sheesh, do you terfs believe your own lies or don't you care?
DeleteThank you, support your well argued point.
ReplyDeleteThank you. I admire your integrity and hope that whatever vitriol comes your way will be drowned by the expressions of solidarity and gratitude for your brave stance. I am sure it will be of enormous benefit to public discusion on GRA going forward.
ReplyDeleteCan we make this an official statement on like moveon.org? I want to back this up so hard!
ReplyDeleteI fully support the GRS and gatekeeping which seperates the frauds and if its changed then it will be a big slap in the face to every real transgender women doing for the right reasons.
ReplyDeletefinally someone is speaking the truth.
ReplyDeletethank you for speaking out, trans has become a complete mockery and danger
ReplyDeleteI have several reservations about this, perhaps of most concern is the very large number of trans people who for personal or beurocratic reason have either not applied fir, or been denied a GIC even having fully medically transitioned.
ReplyDeleteMy second concern is that by laying the whole thing at the door of Stonewall you seem to be ignoring all of the work done by many laudable organisations while Stonewall still excluded us from all of their campaigning.
Please, everyone, look up Lovaas and Operation Paperclip. Then you will see.
ReplyDeleteVery good analysis of the current situation.
ReplyDeleteTS'S need to respond to the Scottish Gov's consultation and stop self ID being written into the law.